Joint and several

Here we are all, by day; by night we’re hurl’d
By dreams, each one into a several world.

Robert Herrick
A short sweet poem I have always loved.
“Each one into a several world” is a lovely usage. Here several means not many but individually distinct and separate from each other. By day we are all but by night we are hurled into our separate worlds, the world of our dreams.Each one of us has to dream his own dream and enact it all by himself. We have no choice to  choose  our dreams  but are hurled into them  and have to play the part assigned to us in them,pleasant or unpleasant.
“Hurled” is reminiscent of Milton’s “hurled headlong” in Paradise Lost. The fallen angels are hurled headlong into hell.
 Dreams are an extension of  sleep  like death from which there is no waking up.By night  each of us  has to face his several world of dreams alone , unlike by day when we are all together.

Does excess protein lead to war-like behavior?

“The really sparsely populated regions where there is plenty of game to go around, according to Chagnon, tend to be the most violent regions.  So Chagnon thinks that if anything this is because the more protein you have—this is one of his theories—the more well-fed you are, the more energy you have for this kind of sport. The Yanomamo see warfare as this: the more they’re struggling just to feed themselves the less energy they have for warfare.

Moreover, war is just not something that you see when you go back into human evolution. And culture, in fact, can also help us overcome this very destructive behavior.”

http://goo.gl/ehXsU

The more protein you have, the more energy you have for the sport of war. Does that make out a case for vegetarianism? In Hinduism we have a concept called satvic food that is essentially food that is supposed to reduce aggression and promote harmony and peace. Excess of animal proteins is believed to promote unnecessary aggression and bellicosity.The Hindu sanyasi (recluse) shuns non-vegetarian food and alcohol and practises abstinence. Traditionally the kshatriyas(warrior class) and the shudras(peasants) are non-vegetarians because their professions demand aggressiveness and physical strength while the brahmins(priests) and the vaishyas(traders) who  have to be peaceful and accommodative and demand less physical strength are vegetarians.

But all that is a hypothesis .More reseach may be required to link excess of protein to aggressive behavior.

Density of experience

” Many visitors come to this city and fall in love with it. What I fell in love with was the density of experience here. This is a chaotic, awkward, historic, and organic city organized on a grid. Although perfect buildings, like the Chrysler Building or the Statue of Liberty, symbolize ‘I Love NY,’ it is the other ordinary buildings, spilling with hectic daily life, that hold real New York life and passion. The fact that they stand right next to the icons is what makes this city special”

Quote taken from Brain Pickings

http://goo.gl/565AW

An interesting observation by a new comer to the city of New York who chooses to own up the city by drawing its buildings. Love the precision of the words. Density of experience about a city is much more than a density of the population in it. Here the density is both horizontal and vertical, across time and space, across divergent levels of consciousness, across the sprawling collective conscious of its people. Only an artist could react  this way to a city  in terms of the experience it offers to the new comer. Especially a new comer who is in the process of owning up the city by grappling with it in drawings.

The organic nature of the city is grasped easily as a grid, in which everything is connected ,in  a chaotic, loosely organised structure. The ordinary buildings too retain their contribution to the city , standing cheek by jowl with the iconic ones.. Like what we experience in Mumbai city, where perfect buildings stand in peaceful co-existence with the drab and listless ones.

Conviction politicians

“Britain’s Conviction Politician

Even her adversaries knew that Margaret Thatcher meant what she said.”
In this news of Thatcher’s passing away there is  a fitting tribute to her memory. A conviction politician is a rare breed somebody like Gandhi or Mandela who is into politics not for polemics or for wealth and/or fame but out of sheer conviction. We surely will like to remember Thatcher as a conviction politician that differentiates her from all the others.  Epithets often used for her like  dogged ,obstinate , fussy ,decisive etc. only re-inforce this basic trait of her personality i.e strong  convictions.
In Indian democracy we can only talk about “convict “politicians these days. Their  conviction rate is quite high.

Writing a selfish book

I try very hard to understand that book but fail completely. It is almost impossible to decipher, and when one or two lines of understanding emerge like telephone poles above a flood, they are at once countered by other poles running in the opposite direction. . . . I truly believe that Joyce has this time gone too far in breaking all communication between himself and his reader. It is a very selfish book.

– Harold Nicolson

 http://thefloatinglibrary.com/2013/04/07/puzzled-reactions-to-finnegans-wake/
I am amused by  this reaction to Finnegans Wake of James Joyce. Joyce is no doubt a hard nut to crack, especially in this one.But that is not the point. Harold Nicolson calls it a very selfish book. Selfish not  in the sense of an author’s megalomanic outpourings without regard for the reader’s understanding. But in the sense of an intensely personal book,written for the author himself. The author goes overboard trying to break all communication between himself and the reader !
That is an extreme statement implying a conscious effort on the part of the writer to make himself completely obscure.Apparently the work is not meant to be read because ab initio it is unreadeable. But why write such a book that cannot be read by anybody! Probably the writer writes it for himself (selfish book).
That this is an extreme statement is evident from the fame that the book has earned for the author over the years.

Telepathy as a scientific goal for achievement is a red herring

Our attraction to the stimulating images of science fiction has likely kept us from realizing that human telepathy might be of little practical use in the real world. Christopher James, neuroscientist from the University of Warwick, UK, says the ideal of communicating complex information from one human to another may be a red herring. In most cases, it would be enough for a computer to communicate a message to us. For example, an air-traffic controller whose attention is spread over many areas could be alerted to two planes in close proximity through something akin to spidey-sense, i.e. an electronic message that would bypass the controller’s collage of human feelings. 

http://bigthink.com/ideafeed/will-humans-ever-achieve-telepathy

Trying to achieve telepathy seems a useless pursuit because it violates the innermost privacy of the individual if others have a go at what he is thinking. Of what use is telepathy in social relationships ?  If the participants get to know what  others are thinking it will be a catastrophe of unmitigated proportions. Most of our relationships like husband-wife, parents-children,boss-subordinate are built around ignorance of what others are thinking about us. If we have access to other’s perceptions of us we will end up in  disharmony and chaos  which are not conducive to the orderly conduct of  our relationships.

Placebos say “I will please” but Nocebos bring on all the imagined horror symptoms unrelated to the condition being treated

“With placebos (“I will please” in Latin), the mere expectation that treatment will help brings a diminution of symptoms, even if the patient is given a sugar pill. With nocebos (“I will harm”), dark expectations breed dark realities. In clinical drug trials, people often report the side effects they were warned about, even if they are taking a placebo. In research on fibromyalgia treatments, eleven per cent of the people taking the equivalent of sugar pills experienced such debilitating side effects that they dropped out.

 The nocebo effect is not confined to clinical trials. After the 1995 Aum Shinrikyo sarin nerve-gas attack in Tokyo, for example, hospitals were flooded with patients suffering from the highly publicized potential symptoms, like nausea and dizziness, but who had not, it turned out, been exposed to the sarin. This is common in disasters where the agent is invisible, as with chemicals or radiation. At the extreme are the occasional outbreaks of mass symptoms with no discernable physical cause, such as a famous case at a Tennessee high school that was evacuated after a teacher reported a “gasoline-like” smell and feelings of dizziness. About a hundred students and staff were taken to the emergency room, and thirty-eight were kept overnight. An extensive investigation found no evidence of any chemical presence, and researchers have since concluded it was a “mass psychogenic illness.”

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/04/the-nocebo-effect-how-we-worry-ourselves-sick.html#ixzz2PSTlcjbY

 

After I had a persistent headache for three days ,some months ago,I thought it had something to do with the eye problem I had ,called “uviitis”. But then uviitis “attack” does not last for more than a day if you use the steroid eye drops and at midnight I opened the internet to find reasons. For the next three days I was convinced I had a brain tumor. Imagine what hell I went through .Luckily  the headache disappeared after the use of the eye-drops.The internet is the biggest nocebo giver.