Comments for Ideasblog http://nisheedhi.wordpress.com Ideas,images,cultural expressions Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:47:28 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on A panty and bra will save many a marriage in Canberra by R.C. http://nisheedhi.wordpress.com/2007/05/15/a-panty-and-bra-will-save-many-a-marriage-in-canberra/#comment-54 R.C. Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:47:28 +0000 http://nisheedhi.wordpress.com/2007/05/15/a-panty-and-bra-will-save-many-a-marriage-in-canberra/#comment-54 Oh, for heaven's sake. Oh, for heaven’s sake.

]]> Comment on A biography of Panini,the ancient Sanskrit grammarian by jitendra panda, http://nisheedhi.wordpress.com/2006/08/19/a-biography-of-paninithe-ancient-sanskrit-grammarian/#comment-53 jitendra panda, Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:56:17 +0000 http://nisheedhi.wordpress.com/2006/08/19/a-biography-of-paninithe-ancient-sanskrit-grammarian/#comment-53 sanskrit is our motherlanguage. so we should not leave it. sanskrit is our motherlanguage. so we should not leave it.

]]> Comment on A biography of Panini,the ancient Sanskrit grammarian by Anonymous http://nisheedhi.wordpress.com/2006/08/19/a-biography-of-paninithe-ancient-sanskrit-grammarian/#comment-52 Anonymous Tue, 12 May 2009 00:18:02 +0000 http://nisheedhi.wordpress.com/2006/08/19/a-biography-of-paninithe-ancient-sanskrit-grammarian/#comment-52 Hi, I'm just wondering if the sanskrit numbers 0-10 were also created from panini? If anyone has any answers please leave a comment saying yes or no and if possible some information on it. Hi,
I’m just wondering if the sanskrit numbers 0-10 were also created from panini? If anyone has any answers please leave a comment saying yes or no and if possible some information on it.

]]> Comment on A biography of Panini,the ancient Sanskrit grammarian by Meenal http://nisheedhi.wordpress.com/2006/08/19/a-biography-of-paninithe-ancient-sanskrit-grammarian/#comment-51 Meenal Thu, 19 Mar 2009 03:27:42 +0000 http://nisheedhi.wordpress.com/2006/08/19/a-biography-of-paninithe-ancient-sanskrit-grammarian/#comment-51 hey sanskrit does mean something if your a true indian you would know!!!!!!Anyway great article hey sanskrit does mean something if your a true indian you would know!!!!!!Anyway great article

]]> Comment on A biography of Panini,the ancient Sanskrit grammarian by Meenal http://nisheedhi.wordpress.com/2006/08/19/a-biography-of-paninithe-ancient-sanskrit-grammarian/#comment-50 Meenal Thu, 19 Mar 2009 03:27:13 +0000 http://nisheedhi.wordpress.com/2006/08/19/a-biography-of-paninithe-ancient-sanskrit-grammarian/#comment-50 hey sanskrit does mean something if your a true indian you would know!!!!!! hey sanskrit does mean something if your a true indian you would know!!!!!!

]]> Comment on It is better to steal than to copy a design by srinathrao http://nisheedhi.wordpress.com/2009/01/18/it-is-better-to-steal-than-to-copy-a-design/#comment-49 srinathrao Sat, 14 Mar 2009 22:58:18 +0000 http://nisheedhi.wordpress.com/2009/01/18/it-is-better-to-steal-than-to-copy-a-design/#comment-49 Thanks,Mike Thanks,Mike

]]> Comment on It is better to steal than to copy a design by Mike http://nisheedhi.wordpress.com/2009/01/18/it-is-better-to-steal-than-to-copy-a-design/#comment-48 Mike Sun, 01 Mar 2009 14:56:43 +0000 http://nisheedhi.wordpress.com/2009/01/18/it-is-better-to-steal-than-to-copy-a-design/#comment-48 Just passing by.Btw, your website have great content! _________________________________ Making Money <a href="http://tinyurl.com/rich-quickly/1149100" rel="nofollow">$150 An Hour</a> Just passing by.Btw, your website have great content!

_________________________________
Making Money $150 An Hour

]]> Comment on Costs of development by nisheedhi http://nisheedhi.wordpress.com/2008/10/23/costs-of-development/#comment-42 nisheedhi Sat, 25 Oct 2008 02:43:59 +0000 http://nisheedhi.wordpress.com/2008/10/23/costs-of-development/#comment-42 I really do not see any point in believing that male consciousness is aggressive ,the female one passive or conversely all that is aggressive in human nature is male and all that passive female although the concept of prakriti-purusha is deep-rooted in our cultural conscious.This assumes that the male is the chaser ,the female chased with its archaic concept of female passivity.I believe that the traditional role of the aggressive male and a docile female archetype had their roots in economic specialisation -the male going out to earn bread and the female rearing children and keeping the house-forced by the need to raise a family and keep it protected from outside dangers.Somewhere along the way the human society added the additionality of female chastity in order to leave no room for an irresponsible male for disowning the offspring or may be,to prevent promiscuity and possible loss of "purity" of the race.All this does not in any way lead to the thrust of your argument that globalisation as practised is basically patriarchally-driven and as a result development tends to remain skewed and one-sided. I believe you say subjugation ,which is supposedly a male characteristic applied in relation to the mate is further extended to Mother Nature and destruction follows.Can we say if the decision-makers are female a better management of the environment will follow ? I don't believe so. I also do not know if it is a scientific fact that humans in stress tend to bear female offspring. Anyway ,thanks for responding to my question and take care. I really do not see any point in believing that male consciousness is aggressive ,the female one passive or conversely all that is aggressive in human nature is male and all that passive female although the concept of prakriti-purusha is deep-rooted in our cultural conscious.This assumes that the male is the chaser ,the female chased with its archaic concept of female passivity.I believe that the traditional role of the aggressive male and a docile female archetype had their roots in economic specialisation -the male going out to earn bread and the female rearing children and keeping the house-forced by the need to raise a family and keep it protected from outside dangers.Somewhere along the way the human society added the additionality of female chastity in order to leave no room for an irresponsible male for disowning the offspring or may be,to prevent promiscuity and possible loss of “purity” of the race.All this does not in any way lead to the thrust of your argument that globalisation as practised is basically patriarchally-driven and as a result development tends to remain skewed and one-sided.

I believe you say subjugation ,which is supposedly a male characteristic applied in relation to the mate is further extended to Mother Nature and destruction follows.Can we say if the decision-makers are female a better management of the environment will follow ? I don’t believe so. I also do not know if it is a scientific fact that humans in stress tend to bear female offspring.

Anyway ,thanks for responding to my question and take care.

]]> Comment on Costs of development by Vaz http://nisheedhi.wordpress.com/2008/10/23/costs-of-development/#comment-41 Vaz Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:10:55 +0000 http://nisheedhi.wordpress.com/2008/10/23/costs-of-development/#comment-41 ofcourse nothing comes without a price ! ofcourse nothing comes without a price !

]]> Comment on Costs of development by Sneha Krishnan http://nisheedhi.wordpress.com/2008/10/23/costs-of-development/#comment-40 Sneha Krishnan Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:33:56 +0000 http://nisheedhi.wordpress.com/2008/10/23/costs-of-development/#comment-40 I meant of course, in the second paragraph (3rd line), Yang-led civilization I meant of course, in the second paragraph (3rd line), Yang-led civilization

]]>